|Russian World Forums
|Retur home with EU law (instead of restrictive national law)
|Page 1 of 1|
|Author:||wiz [ 02 Feb 2016 10:02 ]|
|Post subject:||Retur home with EU law (instead of restrictive national law)|
In the 1992 case of Surinder Singh (Case C-370/90 The Queen v Immigration Appeal Tribunal et Surinder Singh, ex parte Secretary of State for Home Department), the ECJ ruled that when EEA nationals work or are self-employed in another Member State, that on return to their own country they will be entitled to the same community rights, without discrimination, as any other EEA national. In particular, reference was made to the entitlement of ‘family members’ to join the EEA national on their return to their own country.
The significance is that ‘family members’ including a spouse can rely on their right in EC Law to join you in your own country. It is EU Law which regulates your spouse’s entry, not member state national immigration rules.
The reason that the couple decided to exercise their treaty rights does not matter. It only matters that they were exercising treaty rights. The case of Adrich in 2003 (Case C-109/01 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hacene Akrich) reiterated the decision in Singh, and is explicit in saying:
Both rulings have legal effect in all EU countries, including the UK and Ireland. National governments are very aware of the results of these cases, and seem to have implemented it for the most part.
An “Ad-Hoc” comparison of National Law vs. European law and Directive 2004/38/ECwas compiled by the European Migration Network trying to answer the following:
‘Do family members of a national of your Member State have the same/less/more rights than family members mentioned in Directive 2004/38/EC’? In case of differences in the rights, please provide details.’
A couple of other articles are interesting and relevant to this discussion:
|Page 1 of 1||All times are UTC|
|Powered by phpBB|