|Russian World Forums
|Cutting off free movement air of EU citizens living abroad
|Page 1 of 1|
|Author:||wiz [ 17 Feb 2016 17:09 ]|
|Post subject:||Cutting off free movement air of EU citizens living abroad|
Cutting off free movement air of EU citizens living abroad
There are EU citizens who live outside the EU. A Migration Policy Institute article says four million EU citizens were living just in the USA in 2014. Hundreds of thousands (millions?) more live in Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, China, Australia, Brazil, Kazakhstan, India…
The European Commission and the British government are presently proposing to dramatically reduce the fee movement rights of those EU citizens who are married to non-EU citizens and who live outside the EU.
These EU citizens work, buy houses, get married (usually to non-Europeans, since most people around them are not European), have children: just normal daily life. Often they stay forever in their new home, and sometimes they decide to move back to Europe for any of a thousand good reasons.
Presently, European Free Movement law allows them to trivially move to any European country (apart from their natural home country of European citizenship). Their move, and that of their family, is hassle free, and they can easily do it even for short periods.
Some examples I personally know of people moving/working in Europe on the basis of EU free movement law:
These examples can happen because the non-EU spouses is not required to satisfy restrictive local member state immigration laws. Because the spouse can come along, these EU citizens have been able to use their free movement rights.
"The Commission intends to adopt a proposal to complement Directive 2004/38 on free movement of Union citizens in order to exclude, from the scope of free movement rights, third country nationals who had no prior lawful residence in a Member State before marrying a Union citizen"
This is proposed in a Commission document addressing “abuse of the right of free movement of persons“, but the exclusion is not limited to cases where is actual abuse. It would apply to each of the spouses mentioned above, because none of them had ever resided in Europe before marrying their (EU-citizen) spouses.
As Steve Peers points out, the wording says that “lawful residence” must have happened before the start of the marriage. If it was not there when the couple married, there is nothing which can change the situation. Not 20 years of marriage, and not a subsequent period of lawful residence in Europe.
This does not seem to be an attempt to tackle abuse. It seems only an attempt to reduce the number of Europeans who can take advantage of their treaty right of free movement.
Why is this important?
It is generally hard to get European citizens to take advantage of their free movement rights. They tend to not move away from their home, and language is an issue.
Europeans who live outside Europe have already demonstrated that they are willing to live in a different country (different continent!), to adapt, to work. They tend to be very well educated, and bring valuable experience back to Europe with them.
Why is the European Commission proposing to dramatically restrict the right of free movement of these Europeans? Why would member states agree to this?
What to do?
Maybe pause for a few minutes of amazement that the UK and the European Commission are even proposing this.
Does the European Commission really care about free movement rights? It is not clear, but it is worth reaching out to anyone you can who works there.
Most important is to reach out NOW to the embassies and foreign ministries of your member state. If you are German, call the Auswärtigen Amts or your local embassy. Same if you are French, or Polish, or Hungarian. Let them know that you care, and want to maintain your right of free movement even if you have married a non-European.
Decisions are being made this week, and there will be little chance to influence the outcome,
after Thursday Feb 18.
|Page 1 of 1||All times are UTC|
|Powered by phpBB|