All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: It's the biggest scam in the history of mankind
Post Number:#1  PostPosted: 29 Dec 2013 09:04 
Offline
Admin
User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Last Visit: 30 Dec 2020 14:27
Posts: 3641
Location: Surrey UK
Gender: Male
Status: Married
Her/His Country: Russia
RW_here_since: July 2008
Times_to_FSU: Too many to remember
Image
In the history of mankind

Image

FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING, conjuring what the banksters claim is 'money,' but in reality is debt (since there is nothing of inherent value backing it), from thin air, leverage it up by many multitudes, getting a nation to endorse it as monopolistic fiat (and enforce the monopolistic recognition of it as such), it's the problem.

If 95% of the loans go bad (or more), the fractional reserve bankers lose nothing. They created this fiat money from nothing and received the protection of the nation in distributing fiat monopoly currency. Not only do they lose nothing, they actually gain any real assets that were pledged as collateral security for most of the loans that went 'bad' - That's real Harvest!

Repeat this process of Harvest by first inflating the money supply with very cheap rates, getting people deeply indebted (many of whom weren't indebted before), and soon enough, with enough cycles of harvest, what belonged to many people will be concentrated in the hands of the very few and all that via the sham that is called fractional reserve banking. [sick.gif]

Once a person grasps this basic concept, they'll understand why events have taken place as they have (Bretton Woods*; Plaza Accord; Federal Reserve Act of 1913; closing of the Gold standard in 1971*, etc.), and they'll finally grasp how a select few have rigged the game to be able to harvest assets continually, and concentrate wealth and power, by doing nothing other than maintaining close relationships (Deep Capture) of a nation's legislative, judiciary and executive branches NOT only in the US but in every government around the world.

*On the 15 August 1971, the United States unilaterally terminated the convertibility of the dollar to gold. As a result, " the Bretton Woods system officially ended and the dollar became fully fiat currency, backed by nothing but the promise of the Federal government." This action, referred to as the Nixon shock, created the situation in which the United States dollar became the sole backing of currencies and a reserve currency for the member states. At the same time, many fixed currencies also became free floating.

If you could print a currency at no cost, that had no intrinsic value, get the legal system to recognise it as the only legally permissible 'tender' to satisfy all debt, public and private, wouldn't you print as much as you could, loan it out to as many entities and people as you could, and then sit back, not caring whether 90% or 9% of the loans were repaid, since it cost you nothing to produce the loan, meaning that you can only gain assets (securitized) and indebted institutions (create indebted parties that you can then garnish), and literally lose not one atom of anything of inherent value?

Further, if you had access to an entity that could do the above, and you could borrow that currency at absurdly low interest rates, and moreover, you had an express or at least implicit taxpayer guarantee against losses (too big to fail), wouldn't you also not do exactly the same?

If you're the former entity (Banksters), you literally will lose nothing, no matter how reckless your actions are or your lending standards.

If you're the latter party (Borrower), your risk of loss is inconsequential, since you're backed by the taxpayers (involuntarily), and even if you weren't, if you're a very large entity able to borrow at absurdly low interest loans from the banksters, unless you are a complete idiot on a level that equals Lehman or beyond (derivatives did them in, along with a non-bailout), you'd be hard pressed to lose money if even - completely hypothetical and arbitrary % - 20% of the cheap interest money you borrowed and then re-loaned out wasn't paid back to you.

If you're the former, you have not only no risk, but you can't possibly lose anything, since your investment is nothing.

If you're the latter, your risk is incredibly high if you put up security or nothing if you did not!.

This is why the USA and other economies, under fractional reserve banking practices, using currency created from thin air, tied to absolutely nothing of inherent value, and bestowed monopoly status as legal tender, is a factual, literal Ponzi Scheme.

This is why the USA had to close the gold standard, lest they couldn't show "growth" (even though it was merely nominal, credit/debt based transactions) in their official GDP going forward.

You don't even have to tie the fiat money to gold in order to force the economy to produce honest numbers and detect the real level of economic growth or contraction: tie the currency to anything that has inherent value, can be stored, and that isn't infinite in quantity.

The mind bender part for the newly initiated, as I was at one time, to the Matrix is that there's no real 'debt' from the perspective of the fractional reserve central bank; it's hard for those steeped in conventional economics to rip out the notion from their brain that the fractional reserve central bank can't lose anything (they didn't lend anything of value or that cost them anything - they have ZERO cost in the game), and that their favoured entities have only slightly less risk (because they will always be able to socialize their losses via taxpayer bailouts in the wake of busts, while they retain their ill-gotten gains during the booms), and that is what most refer to as debt in this system, it's only a liability for the debtor. If the debtor doesn't repay what was they borrowed (a monopoly currency that cost the lender nothing to produce), they can lose their farm, construction equipment, home, machinery, infrastructure, vehicle, etc. that was used as security or collateral for the loan, or even if the loan was without any security, they can at least see their revenue or wages garnished, be sent into involuntary bankruptcy (where their general pool of assets will be seized upon by creditors, including lenders), and squeezed in other ways.

The only way to avoid this is to not play the game. During crack up booms, you miss out on fiat-based gains, if you don't play the game, and the incentive for playing that game is that if your timing is correct, you can get rid of all debt and convert the excess fiat gains into hard assets having inherent value or other things of inherent value, before the fractional reserve alchemists induce another inflationary-deflationary (or vice-versa) harvest.

If one were fortuitous enough to play the game, and have the skill and/or luck to convert fiat gains into real wealth before the boom turns to bust, they'd probably be idiotic to re-pledge their real wealth assets as collateral for loans ever again (I say probably, because there are exceptions to every general rule, but these people would have to be extremely smart, competent and or connected to the alchemists in such a way that they'd be assured a bailout in the event of another bust whereby their real assets are pledged as collateral for fiat loans).

The Harvest is the end game for the fractional reserve bankers and their minions. As just one example of the rape that is harvest, even generations of families that were land rich (let's say a family that has owned two square miles of prime farmland yielding high value crops for three generations, carrying no debt) can find that an economic downturn suddenly forces them to take the step of obtaining a loan, pledging their farm and equipment as collateral, in the belief that the loan will allow them to survive the downturn and become more profitable at some future point - they're now 'harvestable.'

By pledging real assets to secure a loan of fiat money (conjured from thin air at no cost), one is playing right into the hands of The Money Masters.

That is exactly that actually is going on in Greece and the other heavily indebted countries in the Eurozone, like Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland etc.

PS: I posted this in a Greek language forum, 2 years ago, and was a little difficult to translate in English.... so sorry about the bad language!

_________________
.
Image


 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB